From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 429 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2009 08:17:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 408 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2009 08:17:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:17:06 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KPU00K00MYWBY00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:16:40 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.163]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KPU00K3JMZSI8K0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:16:40 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:17:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] catch syscall -- try 6 -- Build system, testcase and documentation In-reply-to: <200909112125.37458.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ab101st3.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <200909041600.53576.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909101940.29528.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <83vdjp2a5t.fsf@gnu.org> <200909112125.37458.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2 > From: Sérgio_Durigan_Júnior > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:25:37 -0300 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Friday 11 September 2009, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Sorry, I obviously didn't make myself clear. I didn't mean to have 2 > > places mentioning this. I meant to have only one description, the > > first one above, but to put it in the "New commands" section, where > > you put the second one. > > Oh, sorry. Fixed. Take a look, please. Perfect. Thanks.