From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66924-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27936 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2009 17:08:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 27928 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2009 17:08:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:08:31 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KQ200D00Q83HW00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:08:28 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.38.189]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KQ200H0KQA36S80@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:08:27 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:08:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix "show convenience" test
In-reply-to: <200909161416.22783.pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83ab0uyfzk.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <200909152132.15317.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909161416.22783.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00519.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:16:22 +0100
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Hmm, I had already approved Paul's similar follow up patch at
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00105.html>.
> I looks like it was waiting for a docs review.

Ouch! sorry about that (binary attachments tend to have this effect on
me ;-).

>  The variable @code{$_siginfo} is bound to extra signal information
> -inspection (@pxref{extra signal information}).
> +inspection (@pxref{extra signal information}). Note that @code{$_siginfo}
> +could be empty. For example, it will be empty before you execute the
> +@code{run} command.
>  @end table

A couple of comments:

  . "the variable ... is bound to extra signal information inspection"
    is awkward wording.  "How about "contains extra signal
    information"?

  . I don't understand the note about it being ``empty''?  What does
    that mean, exactly, and why the example is talking about before
    `run'?  I could understand that it's empty if no signals were
    delivered yet, but what does `run' has to do with this?

  . Please leave two spaces between sentences, not one.

Thanks.