From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13023 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2009 03:04:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 12845 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Sep 2009 03:04:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:03:54 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KQG00200GDTUS00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:03:51 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.48.81]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KQG00EDHGIEHJ20@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:03:51 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:04:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used In-reply-to: <000301ca3b83$d15fee00$741fca00$@u-strasbg.fr> To: Pierre Muller Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ab0lujtr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <000601c9e4a3$b2f2f980$18d8ec80$@u-strasbg.fr> <000001c9e4de$6e550cb0$4aff2610$@u-strasbg.fr> <000301c9e4e6$b40c5d50$1c2517f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <001501c9e523$feffc1c0$fcff4540$@u-strasbg.fr> <000301c9eed3$c7239d80$556ad880$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090622205616.GD7766@adacore.com> <000301ca3b83$d15fee00$741fca00$@u-strasbg.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00735.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Cc: > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:54:26 +0200 > > Mark never answered that thread, > as a result, this one line patch that fixes > a problem with multiple watches for windows > is not in 7.0 branch :( > > The thread started here: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00054.html > > with > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00416.html > containing the final one code line patch. > > Mark, could you give your impression? If Mark does not respond by tomorrow, please commit this to both branch and trunk. Thanks.