From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-123633-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 120605 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2015 16:42:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 120569 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jun 2015 16:42:14 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:42:12 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NQ300B00KZQCM00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:42:09 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NQ300B3OL286P50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:42:09 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:42:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Introduce build_debug_file_name
In-reply-to: <20150617094734.GA9671@blade.nx>
To: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, cedric.buissart@gmail.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83a8vymgmg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1434447768-17328-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <1434447768-17328-2-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <83zj3zn21q.fsf@gnu.org> <20150617094734.GA9671@blade.nx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:47:34 +0100
> From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, cedric.buissart@gmail.com
> 
> For the case you mention nothing would be stripped (the "d" in that
> path is !IS_DIR_SEPARATOR) so the filename components would be
> concatenated verbatim, just as with the original code.  The resulting
> filename may not make sense, but it's not a regression.

But won't we produce "d://foo/bar" as result?

> I don't believe this series should be blocked unless it breaks
> something that actually worked before.

If a fix is very simple, why not make it?