From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75949 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2020 16:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 75941 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2020 16:01:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=his X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 16:01:56 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivkMD-0005m7-5d; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:01:53 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2825 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ivkMB-0004Rk-0f; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:01:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 16:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83a76ap5p6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, palves@redhat.com, ibuclaw@gdcproject.org, nick.alcock@oracle.com In-reply-to: <20200126114033.GA20733@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:40:33 +0400) Subject: Re: Propose we release GDB 9.1 next weekend (Feb 01-02) References: <20200126114033.GA20733@adacore.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00847.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:40:33 +0400 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: palves@redhat.com, Iain Buclaw , Nick Alcock , Eli Zaretskii > > - [Eliz/NickA/JoelB] libtcf fails to build on MinGW > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 > > The only issue left to fix is the issue with errno. > > => Still waiting for Nick. Rather than putting more pressure > on Nick, I propose we go with Eli's patch of providing > fallback errno values. When Nick is able to confirm > his final patch, we'll decide whether to backport or > stay with the simpler patch from Eli. Fine with me (obviously). Thanks.