From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +qhzEA56qV+TcQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:19:10 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3562D1F08B; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:19:10 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC60B1E552 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:19:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9073887038; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:19:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D9073887038 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1604942349; bh=QerKvzyGxS7xpUiQxDd9A2/t0QC6FXDZWtmtH8QqZmQ=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=mPHSCdIMG4UkOW9+v39ZsphfQJJrkGRCjt7lALwrk96CcrNlkJE6sVPZBjQI1cQl6 aO8QujTU3C1sU6nisTGyf+CLPh2LV/xomtBiL9ldbzAQdt0foi6VWedbm/ymw+PCfg RSz7qTEcb7qDZa0fZ5OTr0t7BF5vRXMCib89xvt4= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8AAD3887038 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:19:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B8AAD3887038 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAos-0002KT-8v; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:19:06 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1887 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAor-0005j7-L0; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:19:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:19:12 +0200 Message-Id: <83a6vq4fe7.fsf@gnu.org> To: Luis Machado In-Reply-To: <20201109170435.15766-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> (message from Luis Machado via Gdb-patches on Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:04:34 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/24] Add NEWS entry. References: <20201109170435.15766-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20201109170435.15766-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:04:34 -0300 > From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches > Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org > > +* GDB now supports general memory tagging functionality if the underlying > + architecture supports the proper primitives and hooks. Currently this is > + enabled only for AArch64 MTE. > + > + This includes additional information when the inferior crashes with a > + SIGSEGV caused by a memory tag violation. > + > +* The "x" command supports the 'm' modifier to display allocation tags for > + a particular memory range. > + > +* The "print" command displays memory tag mismatches for addresses and > + pointers, if memory tagging is supported by the architecture. The "This includes" part should include the other 2 items as well, I presume? So I suggest to reword: This includes: - Additional information when the inferior crashes ... - A new modifier 'm' for the "x" command, which ... - Display of memory tag mismatches by "print" ... Thanks.