From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id v4F4Mn0YqWWJlz8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:24:29 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=N4fPbLUh; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C2F861E0C3; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:24:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9A11E092 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ACF385DC3A for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:24:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AFD3858413 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:24:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 25AFD3858413 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 25AFD3858413 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705580648; cv=none; b=CYbQXPyUDR2lZZSOxHgIz25/j0+gMpJOG1BRTkhUNk0MgPtr4YqrCmb4Q3rvbDlVMHd/grJfhf1y8+4l09q8ILYJrHVB52h+3gOONz0POqmJklRpeHPGuY6zuS3d1tBdIZkLt+lRZvlamGGb4cWjT3wQEWlmLlGZ2BDVL3WzLjo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705580648; c=relaxed/simple; bh=reYP8h8Ku8ckSxWIQaflUYLDiz1dn08b7w5QlnJBp7c=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=t+4Xe9LLK5OW8YtVu4uWlfEB1ITTTCLS+NpO5bMsuyOyA1wcwqJfQWCODxQHC/83MMaQEAUfO8zpgfVv9DVnl0tModG0uk3lMHqxt5FB5FjzSJrE++b6Lk4+vvh+AMK+2EWKnW6XR0gpirK35snRpqhU/KqYHfrVX0ioQ2M3Ao0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQRRC-00051W-IX; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:24:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=bHi4XusI1g9TaU3ymtuBeEvyeGdepU72XPgNgkVCzzA=; b=N4fPbLUhx5s4 P15DdfdMZlQTq7wp0G6w/hCG2AmTEvah5XWp3yhT/cgfyCUPi0PecUhzx+ofTJJsenm39RPy/i/lV pbQTR0f5y1fDrpCBEckdl7l62fQDhGQXZ/PBBmra7dLFDMFW6XuhoChYRwrCcg2uHPr9s1B3B+3OD x/b1+FhvHPjQHktJK1b/lFoUPKVNKe98+ofVy8bmz8Tg//BZ26YJLZmxWxJpZgzWxkEgZMjF6SXeN A4jRPgyW9fnqTbjcoPbp4r27EPv6/0A8Q/tsPZp6NsDpyhKLgDOi78ucGhrvHeKq6RcHkMJ95MgAv hhi1IVDJ7gRQ/u2X5HDo+g==; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:23:51 +0200 Message-Id: <83a5p2ygmg.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Sargsyan, Eduard" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (eduard.sargsyan@intel.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: update link to Oracle DTrace project References: <20231219144500.19442-1-eduard.sargsyan@intel.com> <20231219144500.19442-2-eduard.sargsyan@intel.com> <83v88tgk6m.fsf@gnu.org> <83msu5gg67.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > From: "Sargsyan, Eduard" > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:14:53 +0000 > > So should we use link from Wikipedia? If we want to be just replace old link, to the "same page" we probably need to use the link I have in the patch, but if we want to stay as far away from brands/commercial entities, then probably link to the Wikipedia is better. But in the second case, document reader will need to go to Wikipedia, then follow to links on the Wikipedia page. > Or as an option we can directly use link from Wikipedia: https://dtrace.org/about/ > Which approach you find more desirable? I prefer to link to Wikipedia, since that is unlikely to go away. But let's hear what others here think about this.