From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-63630-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22526 invoked by alias); 10 May 2009 17:37:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 22517 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2009 17:37:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 May 2009 17:37:13 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KJF00B00VHBNI00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 10 May 2009 20:37:09 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.73.80]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KJF002MRVLWHZ60@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 May 2009 20:37:09 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 17:37:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove i386 low level debug register function from nm- header file.
In-reply-to: <005001c9d17f$302199d0$9064cd70$@u-strasbg.fr>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <838wl4zwoq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <005001c9d17f$302199d0$9064cd70$@u-strasbg.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: "'Pedro Alves'" <pedro@codesourcery.com>, "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:54:13 +0200
> 
> Following my first RFC
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-03/msg00197.html
> 
> and the following answers, I resubmit
> a new version where all i386 low level debug register
> is contained in a single struct defined in the 
> new i386-nat.h header (to comply with DOS file name restrictions
> as asked for by Eli).

Looks good to me, thanks (although I didn't yet have a chance to apply
and compile).

>   Once again, the ChangeLog entry is one of the places
> where I don't really know how to handle things exactly...

I don't see anything wrong with your entries here.