From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22613 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2010 21:37:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22602 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2010 21:37:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:37:32 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0K00400U03YX00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:36:30 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0K0047LUOTUW30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:36:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:37:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: PATCH: Support i386 without SSE In-reply-to: <000c01cad75a$b751a490$25f4edb0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> To: Pierre Muller Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <838w8x1va8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100407200547.GA20605@intel.com> <201004081908.o38J8D9H025274@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <000c01cad75a$b751a490$25f4edb0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Cc: > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:33:12 +0200 > > > > This patch supports i386 without SSE. Any comments/suggestions? > > > > Eli, Pierre, can you test wether this fixes the issues on Go32? > > I tested the patch and it does > indeed fix the two problems that I > reported. Thanks for testing. > Nevertheless, there are still strange things: > if you use 'maint print register-groups' > you will find out that > the SSE xmmX registers are still present as registers 32 to 40 > and the ymmX as 41 to 48, but with empty names and a strange int0_t type. H.J., could this be fixed? (I assume it's also part of one of your latest patches; apologies if that's not true.) Thanks.