From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27220 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2011 20:43:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 27212 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2011 20:43:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:43:38 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEG00800S0F6F00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:43:22 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.127.157]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEG006ZTS86BSI0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:43:22 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:43:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] more comment cleanups In-reply-to: <4D2232ED.3080406@vmware.com> To: Michael Snyder Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, brobecker@adacore.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <838vz1oh08.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4D1E60A0.1020601@vmware.com> <201012312312.oBVNC4fc013647@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4D1E732E.4090002@vmware.com> <834o9tq96f.fsf@gnu.org> <4D1F71B0.9060006@vmware.com> <20110103043359.GO2396@adacore.com> <201101030804.p0384T2N020327@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4D2232ED.3080406@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:34:53 -0800 > From: Michael Snyder > CC: "brobecker@adacore.com" , > "eliz@gnu.org" , > "hjl.tools@gmail.com" , > "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > OK, so at least we agree that there should be a "hard" limit at 80? > Really 79, otherwise emacs will wrap it? Breaking news: in a GUI session (as opposed to a TTY) Emacs doesn't wrap at column 79. Instead it simulates the cursor on the fringe.