From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83756-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20852 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2011 06:47:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 20839 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2011 06:47:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 06:47:26 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LRN00G00MLS1G00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:47:18 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.239.98]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LRN00FNIMUOM090@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:47:13 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:02:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [Ada/doco] Document the new -ada-task-info GDB/MI command.
In-reply-to: <1316201377-14830-4-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <838vpnvf9m.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1316201377-14830-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1316201377-14830-4-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2

> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:29:37 -0700
> 
> +@item state
> +The current state of the task.

Would it be a good idea to enumerate the possible states here?  Or is
that common knowledge for anyone who is an Ada programmer?

> +@smallexample
> +-thread-info
> +^done,tasks=@{nr_rows="3",nr_cols="8",

You are documenting -ada-task-info, so why the example is for a
different command?

> +@item ada-task-info
> +Indicates the presence of the @code{-ada-task-info} command.

I would use "availability of" or "support for", rather than "presence
of".  (Yes, I know the other items use the same language you did; I
think they all should be changed.)

Thanks.