From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-94493-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14454 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2012 17:52:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 14439 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2012 17:52:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:51:47 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MA90020008O7B00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:51:22 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MA9000Q409MTBO0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:51:22 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:52:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped
In-reply-to: <1347434118-10931-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <838vcfw2my.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1347434118-10931-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1347434118-10931-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2

> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:15:18 +0800
> 
> +@item =record-started,id=@var{id}
> +@item =record-stopped,id=@var{id}

The second line should use "@itemx", otherwise the result will be
ugly.

> +The process record is either started or stoped in process @var{id}.
> +The @var{id} field contains the @value{GDBN} identifier of process.
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"contains the @value{GDBN} process ID."

By the way: why is it useful to have the GDB PID part of this
notification?  Can you have more than one GDB process at a time that
all communicate on the same wire?

Or did you mean the inferior PID?

Thanks.