Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patchv3 13/11] Make relative-with-system-absolute the default
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <838v76bmh2.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130202180658.GA16269@host2.jankratochvil.net>

> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 19:06:58 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:16:38 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > --- a/gdb/NEWS
> > > +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> > > @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ set filename-display basename|relative|absolute|relative-with-system-absolute
> > >                       |basename-with-system-absolute
> > >  show filename-display
> > >    Control the way in which filenames is displayed.
> > > -  The default is "relative", which preserves previous behavior.
> > > +  Previous behavior was "relative".
> > > +  New default is "relative-with-system-absolute", which prints source filenames
> > > +  from files with present separate debug info in absolute form.
> > 
> > I believe "present" should be removed from here.
> 
> I will remove it but it was present there to highlight it does not apply to
> files with separated debug info where the separate debug info is currently not
> installed.  Although in such case no source filename is printed at all so it
> is irrelevant whether it would be printed in absolute or relative form.

Yes, I believe your last sentence is the reason why this detail does
not need to be mentioned.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-02 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-29 22:11 [patchv2 " Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-30  7:49 ` [patchv3 " Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-30 17:17   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-02 18:07     ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-02 18:27       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-02-05 17:35       ` Doug Evans
2013-02-05 18:23         ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-06 16:02           ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-07 20:25             ` Doug Evans
2013-02-07 20:29               ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-15 19:58                 ` [patch FYI not for commit] Attempt to properly relativize executable's filenames Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=838v76bmh2.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox