From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patchv3 13/11] Make relative-with-system-absolute the default
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <838v76bmh2.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130202180658.GA16269@host2.jankratochvil.net>
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 19:06:58 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:16:38 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > --- a/gdb/NEWS
> > > +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> > > @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ set filename-display basename|relative|absolute|relative-with-system-absolute
> > > |basename-with-system-absolute
> > > show filename-display
> > > Control the way in which filenames is displayed.
> > > - The default is "relative", which preserves previous behavior.
> > > + Previous behavior was "relative".
> > > + New default is "relative-with-system-absolute", which prints source filenames
> > > + from files with present separate debug info in absolute form.
> >
> > I believe "present" should be removed from here.
>
> I will remove it but it was present there to highlight it does not apply to
> files with separated debug info where the separate debug info is currently not
> installed. Although in such case no source filename is printed at all so it
> is irrelevant whether it would be printed in absolute or relative form.
Yes, I believe your last sentence is the reason why this detail does
not need to be mentioned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-02 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 22:11 [patchv2 " Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-30 7:49 ` [patchv3 " Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-30 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-02 18:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-02 18:27 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-02-05 17:35 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-05 18:23 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-06 16:02 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-07 20:25 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-07 20:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-15 19:58 ` [patch FYI not for commit] Attempt to properly relativize executable's filenames Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=838v76bmh2.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox