From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14904 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2013 08:39:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14821 invoked by uid 89); 25 Mar 2013 08:39:01 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_SM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:38:58 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MK700300JVUXN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:38:29 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MK70039TK04SW50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:38:28 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:43:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [MinGW-w64]Build gdb/ctf.c failed In-reply-to: <515009B1.5030500@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: ktietz70@googlemail.com, asmwarrior@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <838v5b3mcx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ip4s4ixc.fsf@gnu.org> <1363407692-18959-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1363407692-18959-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <51492077.30307@codesourcery.com> <83sj3qyogk.fsf@gnu.org> <87vc8m7z1d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <514FA117.9030604@gmail.com> <83hajz3oef.fsf@gnu.org> <515009B1.5030500@codesourcery.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00922.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:24:17 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > CC: Eli Zaretskii , asmwarrior , > , > > Right, 'mkdir' is declared io.h, which is included in unistd.h. Looks > like we should use "mkdir" instead of "_mkdir". How about the patch > below? It unbreaks the build of using mingw-w64 toolchain, while > mingw32 toolchain doesn't complain about it. I think you should "#undef mkdir" before redefining it, to be absolutely safe here. Other than that, I'm OK with this.