From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20123 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2013 17:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20102 invoked by uid 89); 20 Nov 2013 17:58:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:57:05 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWK00L00PE81100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:56:46 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWK00J4SPUFTJ31@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:56:40 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:03:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] don't check for unistd.h In-reply-to: <877gc3jcoy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> To: Tom Tromey Cc: pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <838uwjez3b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1384806318-12231-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1384806318-12231-11-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <13494.0459196971$1384894582@news.gmane.org> <877gc4ksnz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <8738mskqam.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <877gc3jcoy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:49:17 -0700 > > Ok, I dug some more, and I discovered that the gnulib "strerror" module > is the root of our trouble. Dropping it fixes the problem. > > Therefore I'm checking in the appended patch. (I omitted all the > auto-generated crud from it for clarity.) Thanks. Should we perhaps document these incidents somewhere, so that the reasons for these decisions are clearly visible to whoever would like to do this in the future?