From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-126915-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 77254 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2015 15:27:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 77240 invoked by uid 89); 22 Oct 2015 15:27:33 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:27:32 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWM00200O1D4300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:27:29 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWM001NWO9TUC70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:27:29 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:16:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] NEWS: "info" commands now list in ascending order
In-reply-to: <5628FBB2.1030905@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <838u6uudng.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1445507944-9197-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1445507944-9197-7-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <83io5zt0bi.fsf@gnu.org> <5628FBB2.1030905@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00479.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:07:30 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > I'd suggest to add "alphabetic" where indicated.
> 
> That would sound very confusing to me, as we sort by e.g., thread
> ID, not thread name, and alphabetic would suggest to me that we
> now sort by "name" or whatever else looks like a name.
> 
> Would "ascending ID order" or "ascending numerical order"
> instead be OK with you?

Yes, of course.  The point is just "ascending" doesn't say enough, we
should say more about the order.  (I mistakenly thought it was
alphabetic.)

Thanks.