From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAF063857C71 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:17:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org DAF063857C71 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kItmj-0002Vc-1B; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:17:13 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2159 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kItmi-0003dC-E6; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:17:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:17:24 +0300 Message-Id: <838sd87daz.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <83tuw5ir09.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:35:34 +0300) Subject: Re: Problem building today's snapshot with MinGW References: <83tuw5ir09.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:17:16 -0000 > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:35:34 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > At Joel's request, I've built today's snapshot of the GDB master > branch using mingw.org's MinGW, and found a problem when running the > produced gdb.exe on versions of Windows older than 8.0 (in my case it > was XP). The details are described in my report to the Gnulib folks: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2020-09/index.html The Gnulib folks confirmed my report and provided a patch, see https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2020-09/msg00075.html How should we proceed? Do we import the updated Gnulib, or do we patch our copy?