From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id RY3lJEc5HmJPeQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:18:31 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 82F881F3CA; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:18:31 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102991EA69 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:18:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BF83858423 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:18:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 17BF83858423 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1646147910; bh=Mreok4GYrHr63Rix5kd9ZeC02pVPq2guQJAQeLIYgPw=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=KEdhCkjUu6eyP3VSBdn3r/tH6DEO4fxkxMubv6EJFoCJ7owlDNC4JNghIl+U2KCBe Oi9infLkijrm/lx0NTqPYUGQLgKB3uwy40PRZZ93rxbeGBwLGR5athOQRKJT5+o5SL s9asEiHCB20PKgyPleepxVGOzcYFQG/NRrAZH1+Y= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBB63858D20 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:18:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ECBB63858D20 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=37792 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nP4GM-0005G1-01; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:18:06 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1070 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nP4GL-0002GE-BG; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:18:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 17:17:57 +0200 Message-Id: <838rttln16.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: <87czj5locm.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 01 Mar 2022 07:49:29 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Handle non-ASCII identifiers in Ada References: <20220228183304.1162089-1-tromey@adacore.com> <20220228183304.1162089-6-tromey@adacore.com> <83y21ulsuo.fsf@gnu.org> <87lexulnba.fsf@tromey.com> <83wnhel5bn.fsf@gnu.org> <87czj5locm.fsf@tromey.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 07:49:29 -0700 > > These were in Unicode back in 2001. > > Eli> Or maybe we should document what is the > Eli> oldest version of Python that currently suits the needs? > > Most people shouldn't run this script. The output is checked in. And > if they do and get wildly different results, that will be caught in > review. > > Of course, it won't really matter, because you can't really write an Ada > program -- at least, not using GNAT -- that uses anything after 2001 > anyway. This covers all the Python versions that are in normal use. > > For example Python 2.7, the oldest one I have around (and for which gdb > is going to drop support soon anyway): > > >>> import unicodedata > >>> unicodedata.unidata_version > '5.2.0' > > This version of the data comes from 2009, plenty new enough. Ok, I guess there's no real problem, then. Thanks.