From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id oCQ7AEb1RmIOUgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:51:18 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F18E31F1F4; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:51:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6061D1E150 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:51:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8E63858434 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:51:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EA8E63858434 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1648817477; bh=ETI/wIa2+rkP21uz5wp4EcRMkHHxBWLtGSSDh3DW0iA=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=IWGh/1RbK+Fv+C6+qyQKQw07NE+KqUzQsqt4qG6ZMp7/cUAbyrb7Qe6x5yejISfnh Cr4mcpDhG4FQxXNsvjb2uMo1S3MzgqgkYix8NRTu/xxrjbgbc20KGjV9CNxII+0fqI I1LdVRpYYplk7No8/SB57EpjvyDloJDqaoIGZF6Y= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDADB3945C1F for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:50:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DDADB3945C1F Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=51574 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naGjd-0001cM-Dj; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:50:37 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4540 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naGjS-0003Iv-Lc; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:50:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 15:50:38 +0300 Message-Id: <838rsp55nl.fsf@gnu.org> To: Joel Brobecker In-Reply-To: (message from Joel Brobecker on Fri, 1 Apr 2022 05:36:32 -0700) Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing References: <20220320055815.2A90FA4D6C@takamaka.home> <83sfr4a93r.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmm8a7gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83o81sa6nu.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilrzap07.fsf@gnu.org> <83mth67i8m.fsf@gnu.org> <72ad3448-0ff0-f36c-d1f3-cc194c0503b8@palves.net> <83ee2i72vl.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfqx864d.fsf@redhat.com> <83fsmx59wi.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: aburgess@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@palves.net Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 05:36:32 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Andrew Burgess , pedro@palves.net, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com > > > P.S. Aren't these problems visible in the MinGW64 builds of GDB 12? > > IOW, is this only a problem with the MinGW flavor I'm using to build > > GDB? > > We test that configuration every night, and I confirm we haven't seen > that issue. With -i=mi or with the CLI? The latter doesn't show any problems here. Do you also use GDB via Emacs's "M-x gdb" command (which invokes GDB with -i=mi) or with "M-x gud-gdb" (which uses the CLI and annotations)? If this problem only happens with mingw.org's MinGW, I'm okay with having local workarounds. Although I'm puzzled how can that be, since both MinGW flavors are supposed to share the same runtime. Or do you build GDB against the UCRT (as opposed to MSVCRT) runtime?