From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ULCOFpthpWPhvgcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:06:51 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5A5CE1E222; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:06:51 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=REskvb+P; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FB01E110 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:06:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4FF385B50F for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:06:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EA4FF385B50F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1671782810; bh=jYUCxTUIIwCUVMFkooiHRytU44sX0W2/3N0vjuOKO98=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=REskvb+Pu4WFsrIpEfHIb43Wf/GBThjROBBeqj53r7Mhqp6Vf/aRlm78RuWLjj2XD ffEQpjuXoK+JyCDTKi/eJoFq+Ge1ki88XhApnDdoTaPI0grUUe/L40JciG/gkzKYkG AUgb9lC6/pzo7tsFIVb6oNdB6gZO4j003XgGeRwk= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC10F3858D1E for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:06:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BC10F3858D1E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p8d4V-0004Nq-3u; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:06:28 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p8d4H-0001NA-1P; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:06:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 10:05:59 +0200 Message-Id: <838riy8ryw.fsf@gnu.org> To: Simon Marchi Cc: tom@tromey.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luis.machado@arm.com In-Reply-To: (message from Simon Marchi on Thu, 22 Dec 2022 22:34:01 -0500) Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <58b64bf8-90b6-d080-c060-d03761501199@arm.com> <83k02neezy.fsf@gnu.org> <835ye7e9jw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6xrks77.fsf@tromey.com> <83mt7idacj.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 22:34:01 -0500 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luis.machado@arm.com > From: Simon Marchi > > Just wondering, do you build with or without optimizations? With. The GCC switches in gdb/Makefile are: CFLAGS = -O2 -gdwarf-4 -g3 CXXFLAGS = -O2 -gdwarf-4 -g3