From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65679-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11703 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2009 18:49:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 11694 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2009 18:49:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:49:42 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KNG00B00EYR4A00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:49:40 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.23.145]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KNG008CIEYR5F70@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:49:40 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:56:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Implement -break-commands
In-reply-to: <200907271303.13335.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <837hxu3qrg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <200907271303.13335.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:03:12 +0400
> 
> The below patches implement MI -break-commands. As the name implies,
> it's the same as CLI 'commands'.

Thanks.  Could you perhaps say a few words about the use-cases where
this is needed by a front end?

> +Specifies the CLI commands that should be executed when breakpoint
> +@var{number} is hit.  The parameters @var{command1} to @var{commandN}
> +are the commands. If no command is specified, any previously-set
> +commands are cleared. @xref{Break Commands}

Two spaces between sentences, please.

> +-break-command "print v" "continue"

"break-command" or "break-commands"?

OK with those changes.

How about a NEWS entry for this?