From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78689-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31318 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2011 12:05:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 31304 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2011 12:05:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_WT
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:05:34 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LH600L009EJUP00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:05:31 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.53.157]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LH600L0D9L6LW80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:05:31 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:08:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] document the new VxWorks port
In-reply-to: <20110225113815.GE2495@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: guitton@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <837hcoqpyq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1298569763-18784-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1298569763-18784-19-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <838vx5rzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225102624.GB3211@adacore.com> <83ipw8qsfe.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225112647.GA2254@adacore.com> <20110225113815.GE2495@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00756.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:38:15 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> To expand a bit on what Jerome is saying, the reason we also do not
> want to show all the threads that are not being debugged, is that
> we do not want the user to attempt to switch to a thread that he is
> currently not debugging.

But the same danger exists on other systems, and we still show all the
threads in the current inferior.

Maybe it would make sense to show only those that are being debugged,
but do it from "info threads".  (Why would a user want to show other
threads, if she isn't debugging them?)  But if showing them all is
also important, maybe that alone should be a separate wtx-specific
command?