From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-80917-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32430 invoked by alias); 9 May 2011 19:35:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 32219 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2011 19:35:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:35:13 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKY006000WW4B00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 22:35:11 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKY0045D12EKGK0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 May 2011 22:35:11 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 19:35:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for enabling/disabling tracepoints while a trace experiment is running
In-reply-to: <4DC840FE.6050408@codesourcery.com>
To: Kwok Cheung Yeung <kcy@codesourcery.com>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <837h9zis5u.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4DC2DDEF.10600@codesourcery.com> <83hb99m14x.fsf@gnu.org> <4DC32F21.9090400@codesourcery.com> <8339ksm85f.fsf@gnu.org> <4DC840FE.6050408@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 20:31:10 +0100
> From: Kwok Cheung Yeung <kcy@codesourcery.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On 06/05/2011 11:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Btw, what if the target does not support this new feature?  Do we
> > still disallow to start a trace experiment with no enabled
> > tracepoints?  I think we should.
> > 
> 
> I've now added 'EnableDisableTracepoints' to the list of features returned by
> the qSupported packet from a patched gdbserver. GDB now checks whether this is
> supported before trying to enable/disable a tracepoint on the target. If it is
> not, then it silently reverts to the original behaviour.

Thanks.

This version of the docs is fine with me.