From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21003 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2011 18:08:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 20990 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2011 18:08:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:08:41 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LU300200JLU4Z00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:08:31 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.70.69]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LU3001WVJQ5XP50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:08:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:08:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] `info proc *' help fix [Re: [patch] `info proc ' completion] In-reply-to: <20111103170624.GA22871@host1.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <837h3hm63h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20111031070012.GA32610@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110311220.53564.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111101115405.GA15861@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83pqhbn771.fsf@gnu.org> <20111103141144.GA20181@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83aa8dm9f3.fsf@gnu.org> <20111103170624.GA22871@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:06:24 +0100 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com > > On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:56:48 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > add_cmd ("stat", class_info, linux_nat_info_proc_cmd_stat, _("\ > > > -List a bunch of random process info."), > > > +List annotated random process info from /proc/PID/stat."), > > > &info_proc_cmdlist); > > > > I would suggest > > > > List process info from /proc/PID/stat. > > > > > -List a different bunch of random process info."), > > > +List a different bunch of random process info from /proc/PID/status."), > > > > And likewise here. > > The problem is each `info proc XXX' commands reads it in /proc/PID/XXX file, > which may be obvious. But I understand "stat" and "status" may be an > exception as it is difficult to describe what /proc/PID/{stat,status} contain. > > I assume you meant it this way but asking again. Yes. I wanted to get rid of the "random" part which makes an impression that we display things that are not necessarily important. Thanks.