From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28320 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2012 19:29:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 28309 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Dec 2012 19:29:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:29:33 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MFI00H000QAGN00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:29:31 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MFI00H9V0T7A340@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:29:31 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:29:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] (cli/cli-cmds.c) ARI fix: Avoid assignment inside if statement In-reply-to: <001201cde13f$af3ad4b0$0db07e10$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <837go8pnxn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <001201cde13f$af3ad4b0$0db07e10$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00792.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:59:49 +0100 > > Looks almost obvious, but > as it's the first of that kind, > I thought I will send it as RFA nonetheless... > > Can similar changes be committed as obvious? > They usually require some formatting changes, > but generated behavior should not change. > > > Pierre Muller > as ARI maintainer > > > 2012-12-20 Pierre Muller > > ARI fixes: Assignment within if rule. > * cli/cli-cmds.c (shell_escape): Do not set variable value inside > if statement. > (edit_command): Likewise. Since when is that bad C, so much so that we would need to enforce it?