From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3103 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2013 15:21:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3093 invoked by uid 89); 24 Oct 2013 15:21:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout23.012.net.il Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:20:59 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MV600E00I86JL00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:20:56 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MV600EECIMVEZC0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:20:56 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:21:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] set/show code-cache NEWS and doc In-reply-to: <5268D967.2000703@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <837gd2itkj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1382516855-32218-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1382516855-32218-6-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83sivshuux.fsf@gnu.org> <5268D967.2000703@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00758.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:25:11 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > CC: > > On 10/23/2013 11:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Thanks. However, this (and even more importantly, the manual) should > > explain what is "code" in this context. "Code" is too general a word > > to hope that the reader will immediately understand what you mean. > > > > I go through gdb.texinfo, and find "program code" is used in some > places. I choose it. The problem in this case is that it's unclear whether you are talking about accessing the source code or the code (a.k.a. ".text") section of the executable. "Program code" could mean either of these two. > > Also, the last sentence above should be in the manual; it's not good > > that the manual has less details than NEWS. > > OK, add one line in the manual to mention that this improves > disassemble. How about this? Replace "disassemble" with "disassembly", and I'm happy. Thanks.