From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6148 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2013 18:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6133 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2013 18:41:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout23.012.net.il Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:40:59 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVH00K00VW0NZ00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:40:57 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVH00KLTVW8I890@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:40:57 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extra error message from update_watchpoint In-reply-to: <52713E2F.2030709@broadcom.com> To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <837gcueh56.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5260FD66.7090506@broadcom.com> <52616D4B.3020209@redhat.com> <526FE5E9.3000909@broadcom.com> <83ob68dmfb.fsf@gnu.org> <526FF27B.8090209@broadcom.com> <5270F23E.7010602@broadcom.com> <83a9hqepgt.fsf@gnu.org> <52713E2F.2030709@broadcom.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00928.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:13:19 +0000 > From: "Andrew Burgess" > cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > I'd rather make you happy if possible, never hurts to suck up right ;-) Thank you! > The following follows the structure you gave, I'd be happy to go with > this except that it's longer than 80 character... is that an issue? > > "Can't set read/access watchpoint, software read/access watchpoints not > supported, and hardware watchpoints disabled (see set/show > can-use-hw-watchpoints)." This is indeed much better. As for length, I can suggest a shorter variant: Can't set read/access watchpoint when hardware watchpoints are disabled.