From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28276 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2019 19:05:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28265 invoked by uid 89); 27 Apr 2019 19:04:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=day X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:04:58 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKSd5-0005ct-4w; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:04:56 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1403 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hKSd3-00065n-3Z; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:04:54 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <837ebfuv5m.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <2ef82187bed72c3fbe61d851c2d6781b@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:56:11 -0400) Subject: Re: Fix lookup of separate debug file on MS-Windows References: <83ef5ze84y.fsf@gnu.org> <03da9895-5136-1da6-8c37-c4be0d06b608@gmail.com> <8336mfdumf.fsf@gnu.org> <831s1va7h8.fsf@gnu.org> <2697b965-e108-5e7c-75d3-9baa7493141c@simark.ca> <835zr68kiw.fsf@gnu.org> <491fba49-4be5-ef4e-c75e-8b8845673360@simark.ca> <83ftq3v1vv.fsf@gnu.org> <2ef82187bed72c3fbe61d851c2d6781b@simark.ca> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:56:11 -0400 > From: Simon Marchi > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Given the complexity of supporting all these scenarios (if we want to > support them, we at least want to test them, which is a lot of work) and > the fact that they are all theoretical at this point, I would be fine to > go with what you had in your patch (using HAS_DRIVE_SPEC). If somebody > ever needs to remotely debug a Windows machine from a Linux machine and > have GDB find separate debug file in the remote debug file directory... > then they can add the missing pieces :). OK, thanks. I will wait for a day or two for any other comments, and if nothing comes up, will push with a FIXME comment regarding the remote debugging use cases.