From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id VkAIKSXeHmXwqyUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:02:45 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=XmvVUfz1; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9EC6F1E0C3; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 12:02:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EBCE1E028 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 12:02:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13980382BC07 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:02:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 13980382BC07 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1696521763; bh=ye01U26Bp0voXPpVubBtrRZMOIXseoQrlRAQ0Xhy/Rw=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=XmvVUfz1+MRUS9jNaqSDzXpv+We55w6Xfi8TItSdR6cuV6zLUgPpGsAk/fgTsISD4 orMig9Ea4UuOvgKNAqA+SamMeKBx47eSLL0Jek8JtcxGjrgteHfj4O4gBKOCfClhFx lSMYlQvB639m/toJ4Oz4eTsmQlFudCRD+oUWTmZA= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C88F38754BE for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:01:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1C88F38754BE Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoQnJ-0007PJ-Kb; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:01:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 19:01:52 +0300 Message-Id: <837co13vnz.fsf@gnu.org> To: Guinevere Larsen Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, kevinb@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20231005113533.86112-3-blarsen@redhat.com> (message from Guinevere Larsen on Thu, 5 Oct 2023 13:35:34 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] [gdb]: add git trailer information on gdb/MAINTAINERS References: <20231005113533.86112-2-blarsen@redhat.com> <20231005113533.86112-3-blarsen@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Guinevere Larsen > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, > Guinevere Larsen , > Kevin Buettner > Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 13:35:34 +0200 > > + - Acked-By: > + > + Used by a responsible or global maintainer when the patch touches multiple > + areas of GDB, and the maintainer in question is only approving some of > + those areas. When using this tag, add the area(s) at the end of the text. > + This tag is also often described as "partial approval" > + Usage: "Acked-By: Your Name (area)" What are the possible "area"s? And how to indicate more than a single area? And a more general question: when the review comments are minor, we are used to say something like "okay with those nits fixed", meaning that there's no need for posting another version of the patch before committing it "with those nits fixed". Is this an Acked-By/Approved-By or Reviewed-By? Thanks.