From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66428-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2879 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 17:12:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 2871 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2009 17:12:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:12:44 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KPA00300Y7TG200@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:12:12 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.144.38]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KPA004B4YGA3D40@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:12:11 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:12:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC Prec] Add process record skip 6/6 (doc)
In-reply-to: <daef60380909010156y379e470pf9781f18aa198427@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com, green@moxielogic.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <8363c2a8we.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380908190112i70ac8e42hda2689773dfd47f8@mail.gmail.com> <837hwzir3w.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908222033y4af21f93n7b7f41fe066ca54d@mail.gmail.com> <8363cefkkp.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908240149n6ed65a95u6bd75750eee21854@mail.gmail.com> <83fxbhdofo.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908242047i727e42b7w153c2ed58a060cf8@mail.gmail.com> <83skfecvmz.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380908310626q41dfee5al987dbeac3d60ee03@mail.gmail.com> <83hbvo9blv.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380909010156y379e470pf9781f18aa198427@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:56:42 +0800
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com, green@moxielogic.com
> 
> I think this idea is not bad.  But when user set a simple_function to
> GDB, check if this function is really a simple function or not is not
> easy.

Why should GDB care?  Let the user care.

> What about keep this idea and add special patch for it when gdb
> support record skip?

<Shrug> If no one else is concerned about this, I can live with that.

> +beginning of a function.  When this breaks break, if
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"When this breakpoint breaks"

Otherwise, fine.