From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25908 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2009 08:34:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 25899 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Nov 2009 08:34:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:34:25 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KSO00C00IG70000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:34:22 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KSO00AQQIH7Y820@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:34:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:34:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] replay bookmarks In-reply-to: <4AF36226.6020800@vmware.com> To: Michael Snyder Cc: teawater@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, glaw@undo-software.com, jakob@virtutech.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83639oaw6i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4AEDF9F4.9040207@vmware.com> <834opec530.fsf@gnu.org> <4AEE27E9.1070005@vmware.com> <4AF315B5.3070809@vmware.com> <83eiocbx4i.fsf@gnu.org> <4AF36226.6020800@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:39:18 -0800 > From: Michael Snyder > CC: "teawater@gmail.com" , > "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , > "glaw@undo-software.com" , > "jakob@virtutech.com" > > >> + add_com ("goto-bookmark", class_bookmark, goto_bookmark_command, _("\ > >> +Go to an earlier-bookmarked point in the program's execution history.\n\ > >> +Argument is a bookmark saved earlier by using the 'bookmark' command,\n\ > >> +or the special arguments:\n\ > >> + start (beginning of recording)\n\ > >> + end (end of recording)\n")); > > > > This says nothing about what kind of argument it expects. Is it a > > number? a name (i.e. string)? something else? > > Thanks. Better? Yes, much better. Thanks.