From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32218 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2011 12:08:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 32209 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2011 12:08:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_WT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:08:02 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LH6005009C1RC00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:07:59 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.53.157]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LH6005A79P9IE80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:07:59 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:15:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] document the new VxWorks port In-reply-to: <20110225120115.GC2254@adacore.com> To: Jerome Guitton Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <8362s8qpum.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1298569763-18784-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1298569763-18784-19-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <838vx5rzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225102624.GB3211@adacore.com> <83ipw8qsfe.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225112647.GA2254@adacore.com> <83d3mgqr7y.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225114413.GF2495@adacore.com> <20110225114943.GB2254@adacore.com> <20110225115539.GG2495@adacore.com> <20110225120115.GC2254@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00757.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:01:15 +0100 > From: Jerome Guitton > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Joel Brobecker (brobecker@adacore.com): > > > > Not sure that it would make this much clearer, as "info tasks" exists > > > as well. An other source of confusion here is that "task" means > > > also something different in Ada. > > > > But at the same time, we're saying threads when we really mean > > "VxWorks Tasks", no? I think that the "wtx" prefix in the command > > might help make things clearer. Otherwise, how about "info wtx > > vxworks-tasks"? > > Interesting name. This command used to be called "info vxworks-tasks" :) Well, it sounds like a good name to me ;-)