From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84919-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4178 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2011 18:25:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 4158 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2011 18:25:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:25:05 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LU300500KCVN500@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:25:04 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.70.69]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LU30050LKHRNC10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:25:04 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:25:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Status of 'blacklist' patch?
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1111031758000.31737@tp.orcam.me.uk>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, justin.lebar@gmail.com, stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <8362j1m5bw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAD_=9DR9YN19cRJ4W7+oA+WQ92HCh=V08Ms8QL67V5cg4R12Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWcpZ7UuD23wChztKuxPuYCM8FdUfEOqzcHT85YHusoCOvRZw@mail.gmail.com> <83ipnjs9i1.fsf@gnu.org> <CAFWcpZ6JtXqu3W9A05CO5ZuAxYGev8W_-kUsGOZWDB5Y+2JuOA@mail.gmail.com> <83ipndc92n.fsf@gnu.org> <CAFWcpZ7Pjc+ey4K6oaganTGt5qr1m7HdJF9kM31x-THJcvr2Hw@mail.gmail.com> <83ehy0ded8.fsf@gnu.org> <CAFWcpZ4YRn4ZE+ZcXLtavpe=U4JdLnQUde91n5TdX51QpdrEGA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA753C4.60408@mentor.com> <E1RIyYU-0004Vf-J8@fencepost.gnu.org> <CAFWcpZ6L19SsFsJTD9Jf=Et7chWTeU-rywDmP6rDZzPPDnWFLw@mail.gmail.com> <m3bot099ut.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CAFWcpZ7wD9tiXStFcapLA+GpjB8w6aLXrAUFpQreHEnMGj_xuA@mail.gmail.com> <m3zkgk7uxu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4EAF2E0E.7080508@earthlink.net> <CAFWcpZ7AiW6zdEuzS4SWjwAa5h_Y7ZmiJyPhZRH8NrH5vpikNA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1111022229240.31737@tp.orcam.me.uk> <83fwi5n9nn.fsf@gnu.org> <m3k47htgy2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1111031758000.31737@tp.orcam.me.uk>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:04:08 +0000
> From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, <justin.lebar@gmail.com>,
> 	<stanshebs@earthlink.net>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
>  What about the other places where @subsection is used without @node -- 
> are they legitimate?

They are legitimate, but having sections and subsections without a
@node makes finding them harder, since there's no commands in Info to
find a section by name, only by its node name.  So I'd like to avoid
introducing more of them.

> I followed their precedent here.

Well, bad precedent ;-)

Most of them originated long ago.