From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7829 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2011 22:03:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 7820 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2011 22:03:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:02:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LWV00300UD5TV00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:02:54 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.18.76]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LWV003ZVUKRSO10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:02:54 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:23:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add extra 'info os' information types for Linux (trunk and 7.4) In-reply-to: <201112272124.pBRLOdtk012930@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> To: Mark Kettenis Cc: stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <8362h1wu3y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4E95DC58.7030805@codesourcery.com> <4ECD3496.1070609@codesourcery.com> <4EF9497B.9020501@earthlink.net> <201112272124.pBRLOdtk012930@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00852.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:24:39 +0100 (CET) > From: Mark Kettenis > CC: stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Eli, I don't think your objection makes a lot of sense. That kind of argument is not an efficient way of making me change my mind. > The "info os" > is a generic command for displaying "osdata" that's made available by > the backend. It is for the backend to decide what information is made > available. This diff just adds a bit more "osdata" to the Linux > native backend and the Linux gdbserver remote backend. Then let's lump there also the DOS- and Windows-specific "info" commands for a good measure. IOW, either "info os" is a hodgepodge of every OS-specific information we provide about the process being debugged, or we have OS-specific "info FOO" ("info dos", "info w32", "info linux", etc.) commands. Having some of this and some of that is just inconsistent.