From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5322 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2012 16:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 5309 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2012 16:24:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:24:48 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MET00800PHEXU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:24:46 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MET0081GPLA6BE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:24:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:24:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA/mingw32] environment variables are case-insensitive on win32 In-reply-to: <20121210161710.GB16027@calimero.vinschen.de> To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <836249c1tl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <50B902D0.6060809@redhat.com> <20121203113147.GB12055@adacore.com> <20121209235344.GA12152@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20121210105115.GB15147@adacore.com> <20121210110128.GA12570@calimero.vinschen.de> <20121210134935.GL31477@adacore.com> <20121210152408.GB11967@calimero.vinschen.de> <20121210154231.GC17188@adacore.com> <20121210155752.GA16027@calimero.vinschen.de> <83a9tlc2jb.fsf@gnu.org> <20121210161710.GB16027@calimero.vinschen.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:17:10 +0100 > From: Corinna Vinschen > > > If some versions of Cygwin are case-insensitive in this context, while > > others aren't, then a run-time test of the kind coded by Jerome is > > _exactly_ the Right Thing. > > These old versions are not at all supported anymore. The right thing to > do in this case is update. Why is requiring users to upgrade more reasonable than half a dozen lines of simple code?