From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126258 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2015 06:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 126236 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2015 06:04:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 06:04:23 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NL400I00ZBJAG00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:04:21 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NL400I4VZJ89340@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:04:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 06:04:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support gzip compressed exec and core files in gdb In-reply-to: <873859or08.fsf@redhat.com> To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: eager@eagerm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <8361a54en1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54FF77D6.7010400@eagerm.com> <83y4n34ik9.fsf@gnu.org> <55009DA7.4070504@eagerm.com> <83lhj3470i.fsf@gnu.org> <873859or08.fsf@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2 > From: Sergio Durigan Junior > Cc: Michael Eager , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > binutils@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:16:55 -0400 > > On Wednesday, March 11 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> I think it might be good to tell people how to specify where the > >> uncompressed file is located. > > > > Saying "system-wide temporary directory" does tell that, doesn't it? > > Users of each platform know where that is, I think. > > Why not say: > > system-wide temporary directory (e.g., @file{/tmp} on some systems) > > ? That'd be fine with me, thanks.