From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id sMY/MH9uA2OgeSsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:54:39 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C38D71E4A7; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:54:39 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=oH99zTnO; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CFC81E21F for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:54:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EAD3858291 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:54:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65EAD3858291 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1661169278; bh=sFHYbKGGexvswQgAikRZqzFqe90K67Ef3C8hBaHJOns=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=oH99zTnO0kfxzlFHBHUpt/3/3Agxq0CzpprxVjIUmHBgal4oWFZotiExU3+BrVJxB lZ4f9aMtAxQQ8baMoIYp+r183wxI330o5mL+dTFy5Mg2nWogm9Z+AUk5tmVe2OKdj+ GUld6UckQBXnSvMyebgT3y8ZUv0m2iV6yiJla/r0= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E983858D32 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:54:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 99E983858D32 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ60Y-0002L7-3o; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:54:18 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4040 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ60X-0007UU-FU; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:54:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:54:20 +0300 Message-Id: <835yikbij7.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andrei Pikas In-Reply-To: <20220821210703.22790-1-gdb@mail.api.win> (message from Andrei Pikas on Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:07:03 +0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 (documentation fixed)] Add an option with a color type. References: <835yindr0c.fsf@gnu.org> <20220821210703.22790-1-gdb@mail.api.win> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@mail.api.win, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Andrei Pikas > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, > Andrei Pikas > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:07:03 +0300 > > +It is user's responsibility to provide colors supported by its terminal. I'd rephrase this (here and elsewhere in the patch): It is the responsibility of the user to verify that the terminal supports the specified colors. Thanks.