From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-63714-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31953 invoked by alias); 13 May 2009 18:05:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 31576 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2009 18:05:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:05:26 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KJL00L00GTZI900@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 21:05:23 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.73.80]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KJL00MECGWY1G70@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Wed, 13 May 2009 21:05:23 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:05:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GDB/MI documentation
In-reply-to: <18954.41627.111280.24736@totara.tehura.co.nz>
To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <834ovoswt3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <18954.41627.111280.24736@totara.tehura.co.nz>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:36:11 +1200
> From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts)
> 
> 
> I think it would be quite easy to read GDB/MI General Design and still not
> understand the overall purpose of GDB/MI.

Feel free to suggest the text you think is missing.  I'd welcome any
such patches.

TIA

> Here are just a few basic changes that preserve the content.

I'm okay with adding nodes, but the rest of the changes don't make the
text any clearer than it is already.

> + * Asynchronous command execution and non-stop mode::

This node's name is too long, consider making it shorter (it does not
have to be identical to the subsection name).

Thanks.