From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19755 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2014 16:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19743 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2014 16:02:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout23.012.net.il Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:02:36 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0X00I00Z0BW400@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:02:33 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0X00IN7Z83KM90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:02:27 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:02:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [Windows/RFA/commit] Deprecate windows-specific dll-symbols command and aliases In-reply-to: <20140213120103.GZ5485@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <834n43rofm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1391161706-340-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <834n4k75iu.fsf@gnu.org> <20140131113924.GB4101@adacore.com> <83zjmc5q2i.fsf@gnu.org> <52F14B9D.3000802@redhat.com> <20140210143456.GC5485@adacore.com> <52FB88CB.6000706@redhat.com> <20140212171738.GR5485@adacore.com> <20140213120103.GZ5485@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00470.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:01:03 +0400 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Hi Eli, > > Since you are the official Maintainer of the GDB documentation, > would you mind telling us what you think? I thought I already did, in the beginning of this thread. Didn't I? > I'd like us to make a decision, so that I can redo the documentation > that goes with the patch. What is the mechanism of making decisions when not everybody agrees? If by majority, then it sounds like 2 out of 3 want/prefer alternative #3.