From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99531 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2015 07:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99465 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2015 07:11:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 07:11:14 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NS100I007SCWQ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:11:11 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NS100IVY7YMNI90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:11:11 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 07:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make sure GDB uses a valid shell when starting the inferior and to perform the "shell" command In-reply-to: <87oaj148e7.fsf@igel.home> To: Andreas Schwab Cc: sergiodj@redhat.com, simon.marchi@ericsson.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <834mks3e5r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1437761993-18758-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com> <55B2850D.6030306@ericsson.com> <87k2tp5q3g.fsf@redhat.com> <838ua52wmp.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaj148e7.fsf@igel.home> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00739.txt.bz2 > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , simon.marchi@ericsson.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:18:08 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Since the number of valid shells is much smaller than the number of > > non-shell programs, isn't it better to have a database of known shells > > than to have a database of non-shells people could be expected to set > > SHELL to? > > This database will be of infinite size. Why should it be invalid to set > SHELL=/foo/bar if that's my self-compiled super-duper shell? The same goes for non-shells as well.