From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103314 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2018 16:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 103234 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2018 16:43:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:43:44 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1efTZr-0003Un-5e for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:43:43 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1efTZr-0003Uh-2A; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:43:39 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3525 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1efTZq-0001A3-Ba; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:43:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:43:00 -0000 Message-Id: <834ln7jlqc.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20180122042744.c55gq3mh7hkp5msi@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:27:44 +0400) Subject: Re: Compilation warning in simple-object-xcoff.c Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <833733x2zj.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2qksnm2.fsf@gnu.org> <834lnfrzae.fsf@gnu.org> <20180122042744.c55gq3mh7hkp5msi@adacore.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:27:44 +0400 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > I committed the patch. > > > > So now that this patch is committed to upstream libiberty, is it OK to > > push it to GDB's copy of the library? > > Yes. For libiberty, incorporating patches from upstream is considered > an "obvious" change in the sense that it does not require prior > approval. We should actually always keep the two in sync, but as > we know, they easily forget, hence the occasion "resync" patches... Thanks, pushed to master and cherry-picked to gdb-8.1-branch.