From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62790-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30168 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2009 17:40:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 30152 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2009 17:40:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:40:47 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHU00A00GUNGO00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:40:07 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHU002NXH2U2X60@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:40:07 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:40:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Document task-specific breakpoints
In-reply-to: <20090409173304.GK7535@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <833ach4tj2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20090325214556.GD9472@adacore.com> <20090325220236.GF9472@adacore.com> <uwsacnc65.fsf@gnu.org> <20090326223902.GL9472@adacore.com> <m3eiw1vkpj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090409165926.GJ7535@adacore.com> <8363hd4uhq.fsf@gnu.org> <20090409173304.GK7535@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:33:04 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >   @xref{Thread-Specific Breakpoints}, for more about this.  For
> >   Ada-specific aspects, see @ref{Ada Tasks}.
> 
> I agree with what you are saying, except that I think that the actual
> suggestion does not flow well with the way the paragraph is written.
> Currently, we have:
> 
>     It is also possible to insert a breakpoint that will stop the program
>     only if a specific thread or a specific task hits that breakpoint.
>     @xref{Thread-Specific Breakpoints} and @ref{Ada Tasks} for more
>     information about this feature.
> 
> Basically, we say: thread-specific breakpoint, or task-specific
> breakpoint.  Then xref thread-specific. Then xref task-specific.

In that case, how about

     It is also possible to insert a breakpoint that will stop the program
     only if a specific thread or a specific task hits that breakpoint.
     @xref{Thread-Specific Breakpoints}, for more information about
     thread-specific breakpoints; see @ref{Ada Tasks}, for more
     information about task-specific breakpoints.

or

     It is also possible to insert a breakpoint that will stop the program
     only if a specific thread (@pxref{Thread-Specific Breakpoints})
     or a specific task (@pxref{Ada Tasks}) hits that breakpoint.

> So I propose the following in the end:
> 
>     It is also possible to insert a breakpoint that will stop the program
>     only if a specific thread or a specific task hits that breakpoint.
>     @xref{Thread-Specific Breakpoints}, and @ref{Ada Tasks}, for more
>     information about this feature.

That's also OK.