From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15507 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2009 18:43:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15498 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2009 18:43:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:43:08 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KS600000RRUM100@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:42:39 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.77.20]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KS600LJGRZ3XV50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:42:39 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:43:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch][doc] PR python/10781 In-reply-to: <4AE71723.10207@redhat.com> To: Phil Muldoon Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <833a54fzks.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4AD82247.3070503@redhat.com> <838wfbixtf.fsf@gnu.org> <8363afi3hf.fsf@gnu.org> <834opzi2bf.fsf@gnu.org> <4AE71723.10207@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00660.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:52:03 +0000 > From: Phil Muldoon > CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On 10/16/2009 08:08 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Here's the text that I propose to use: > > > > +@defmethod Value cast type > > +Return a new instance of @code{gdb.Value} that is the result of > > +casting this instance to the type described by @var{type}, > > +which must be a @code{gdb.Type} object. If the cast cannot be > > +performed for some reason, this method throws an exception. > > +@end defmethod > > > > Ok to check this patch in? If you are asking me, the answer is obviously yes, since it's text I wrote.