From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4327 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2011 12:56:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 4318 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2011 12:56:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_WT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:56:39 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LH600F00BPYPT00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:55:41 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.53.157]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LH600EU1BWRBJD0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:55:41 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:20:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] document the new VxWorks port In-reply-to: <20110225121527.GH2495@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: guitton@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <8339ncqnn4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838vx5rzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225102624.GB3211@adacore.com> <83ipw8qsfe.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225112647.GA2254@adacore.com> <83d3mgqr7y.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225114413.GF2495@adacore.com> <20110225114943.GB2254@adacore.com> <20110225115539.GG2495@adacore.com> <20110225120115.GC2254@adacore.com> <8362s8qpum.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225121527.GH2495@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00759.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:15:27 +0400 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > So would "info wtx vxworks-tasks" be OK? Fine with me, thanks.