From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-80417-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3447 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2011 09:34:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 3390 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2011 09:34:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:33:49 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LJW00E007R1O000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:33:46 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.96.168]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LJW00DV97W8VCG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:33:46 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:34:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC-v4] Handle cygwin wchar_t specifics
In-reply-to: <004f01cbfe72$adddeb40$0999c1c0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <8339leio0d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <5928.31498147479$1302882967@news.gmane.org> <m3ei53cres.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <005101cbfc50$193136b0$4b93a410$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20110416162455.GA5599@host1.jankratochvil.net> <000001cbfc7d$3f67f440$be37dcc0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <83zknpoacd.fsf@gnu.org> <21014.6501930014$1303139687@news.gmane.org> <m3zknn7a2v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <004f01cbfe72$adddeb40$0999c1c0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:17:59 +0200
> 
> 2) If sizeof(gdb_wchar_t) == 1
> I don't think that UTF-8LE and UTF-8BE exist, do they?

No.  Single-byte encodings are by definition endian-less (because
endianness is about byte order in multibyte words).