From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-80920-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7931 invoked by alias); 9 May 2011 20:36:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 7887 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2011 20:36:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:36:29 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKY00D003MDU800@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 23:36:27 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKY00D4A3WQLRC0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 May 2011 23:36:27 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 20:36:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [doc RFA]: New option --with-iconv-bin
In-reply-to: <BANLkTikvtS3eSk_8e+40X5ky9h_HEX5VNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <8339knipbj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20110509181947.6FF002461A8@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <83d3jritdz.fsf@gnu.org> <BANLkTikvtS3eSk_8e+40X5ky9h_HEX5VNQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:19:56 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Why not just say "if your @command{iconv} program is installed in a
> > non-standard place, you will need to tell @value{GDBN} where to find
> > it."?
> >
> 
> The iconv program comes from glibc, but you're right, it doesn't
> *necessarily* come from there.
> 
> How about this?

It's fine, but...

> +If @value{GDBN} is using the @code{iconv} program and it is installed in
> +a non-standard place, you will need to tell @value{GDBN} where to find it.

The first "it" is ambiguous: it could have meant GDB or iconv.
Suggest a slight rephrase:

 If @value{GDBN} is using the @code{iconv} program which is installed
 in a non-standard place, ...