From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11595 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2012 17:11:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11578 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2012 17:11:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:11:07 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8Y00400NPGET00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:10:38 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8Y0044NNPQ4M70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:10:38 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: GDB 7.5: Problems with the auto-load safe-path feature In-reply-to: <20120818161925.GJ2798@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83393kgm78.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d32ogz3g.fsf@gnu.org> <20120818132128.GA6431@host2.jankratochvil.net> <838vdcgs7c.fsf@gnu.org> <20120818161925.GJ2798@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:19:25 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > BTW sorry for this note but 7.5 had a long pre-release time to catch these > > > issues you are reporting. > > > > There's a limit to how many projects one can pretest, and still do > > something useful during the day (assuming GDB maintenance is not what > > you get your paycheck for). > > I think that's a fair comment. On the other hand, there are always > going to be things tested by others that you might disagree with, > as is the case here. That's life, and I accept that. I can always patch my own GDB to fix any such problems. I only wrote the above in response to Jan's comment about having ample time to complain about these issues before the release.