From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-110474-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28633 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2014 17:58:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 28617 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2014 17:58:55 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout29.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il (HELO mtaout29.012.net.il) (80.179.55.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:58:55 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1700B00DH2JV00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:01:22 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N170060EE2AO930@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:01:22 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:58:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
In-reply-to: <87ha7w71ri.fsf@gnu.org>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Cc: xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <8338jg715m.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
References: <wrbvbwejihe.fsf@sspiff.org> <wrbr471jxjg.fsf@sspiff.org> <834n3x8o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ@mail.gmail.com> <83y519788a.fsf@gnu.org> <CAP9bCMQiZurfMyU-qA9LEy_6_BOyRE1-dke93_m505EHuNZrAA@mail.gmail.com> <871tz0d5vc.fsf@gnu.org> <83iosc76kz.fsf@gnu.org> <87txbw9xp4.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9do741d.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha7w71ri.fsf@gnu.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2

> From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: xdje42@gmail.com,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100
> 
> > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
> > without pthreads.
> 
> Because with the patch Doug posted, both the SIGINT thread and GDB’s
> main thread would call libguile.
> 
> A different strategy would need to be used when Guile lacks pthread
> support.

Could you perhaps suggest such a different strategy?