From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 64GYE3yQul+aLQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:23:24 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 446801F0AB; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:23:24 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E703D1E58D for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:23:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D55D3858009; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:23:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4D55D3858009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1606062203; bh=0HoQdNdnBr6TOxHmCAkcRzVaiS3lqX4MzdiL6nu8Opk=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=ICNZ52Flu3N+q37R3Y3qVocaEMDHZGIuutQeyE9YwnjUG7624biFTyp/FmNDMOl3T eqFh3EgkXEbxUuODLZj4UVLi6d/FVIOu2slnXsK8Xfdobd6FL+K4qwTttsuf+ccpeK Hw02tX3LqXTR1iUccTFqATnw2spee5RfSmxBLw74= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E4C3858009 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:23:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 30E4C3858009 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgs92-0003W4-OV; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:23:20 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4130 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kgs92-0003ys-8i; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:23:20 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 18:23:12 +0200 Message-Id: <833611xswf.fsf@gnu.org> To: gmail Vladimir =?utf-8?Q?Kokovi=C4=87?= In-Reply-To: <562f0b99-1fd9-27d4-997e-d4e53c790d03@gmail.com> (message from gmail Vladimir =?utf-8?Q?Kokovi=C4=87?= on Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:19:49 +0100) Subject: Re: mingw --enable-tui References: <83h7phxvb0.fsf@gnu.org> <562f0b99-1fd9-27d4-997e-d4e53c790d03@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: gmail Vladimir Koković > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:19:49 +0100 > >   CXX    tui/tui.o > ../../../src/gdb-10.1/gdb/tui/tui-win.c:130:1: error: narrowing > conversion of ‘2147483648’ from ‘chtype’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} > to ‘int’ [-Wnarrowing] >   130 | }; >       | ^ > ../../../src/gdb-10.1/gdb/tui/tui-win.c:130:1: error: narrowing > conversion of ‘2483027968’ from ‘chtype’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} > to ‘int’ [-Wnarrowing] So in the ncurses headers you used A_NORMAL etc, are declared 'chtype' (or long long unsigned int), is that right?