From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id SA+2FeiPiWCZLAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:08 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 56BEF1F11C; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB961E54D for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49544394342D; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:40:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 49544394342D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619628007; bh=fcSWocuDQrD2pdpUG34By5PwAQFmIPmyfZbWcYE2NpM=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=XUV5vFGIuSBlmzLKwSjtm3wsDD5GYJ8mSEgMBB1IzQ4fAs6UXezKfBa2LC25PuTJ+ w4Gg2SWuN9vCda7EkfP7B2KqcUOt1/0zpclhqJqEuQ59x9QPiX6vFSUO9hccdqhCr8 cw8cq0ZWYrtBOOA7FFxAYr3AoXaHQFbVxc8yQSQA= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21ECF394342D for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:40:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 21ECF394342D Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbnEG-0003AL-PQ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:00 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3225 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lbnEF-0001sV-B0; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:39:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:39:49 +0300 Message-Id: <8335vafjmy.fsf@gnu.org> To: George Barrett In-Reply-To: (message from George Barrett via Gdb-patches on Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:27:49 +1000) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Guile: add value-const-value References: <&e1lx8mojs1b03hu3o_asydo0za8-nyh&337akgbzjn.o13/-otj@mail.bob131.so> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:27:49 +1000 > From: George Barrett via Gdb-patches > Cc: George Barrett > > The Guile API doesn't currently have an equivalent to the Python API's > gdb.Value.const_value(). This commit adds a procedure with equivalent > semantics to the Guile API. > > gdb/ChangeLog: > > 2021-04-29 George Barrett > > * guile/scm-value.c (gdbscm_value_const_value): Add > implementation of value-const-value procedure. > (value_functions): Add value-const-value procedure. > * NEWS (Guile API): Note the addition of the new procedure. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > 2021-04-29 George Barrett > > * guile.texi (Values From Inferior In Guile): Add > documentation for value-const-value. > > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2021-04-29 George Barrett > > * gdb.guile/scm-value.exp (test_value_in_inferior): Add test > for value-const-value. OK for the documentation parts. Thanks.